As I know little about these old companies, there are conflicts on the net that claim Soligor was nothing more than a marketing company, like Vivitar, that commissioned third party manufactures to build their lenses. On the other hand, Soligor GMBH is listed as a optical manufacture, and this little clue I found on a forum, posted by Mischa Launhardt, is interesting. To think that Soligor hired talent from both Zeiss and Schneider, two very well respected German lens makers to design their zooms might be plausible.
My best guess is either Ashashi (as it remarkably similiar to the Takumar 135mm f3.5), or some say Sun-Optics by way of the serial number (I haven't been able to verify that).
Regardless of my research, or luck, I still have to factor in the toll that time and use, (or abuse) can do to any given lens, and in the end, the only way to know for sure was just buy it and try it. So I bid at twenty-five and won.
With the exception of a small dent on the lens hood and a loose focus barrel (a common issue I've read, and an easy fix), the lens was otherwise perfect.
The seller descibed this as a "mark" on the body. "Ouch".
The glass was immaculate, with no issues of haze, fungus, or out gassing, (in fact there is very little dust inside). The six-bladed aperture was also oil free and snappy.
six bladed aperture.
Tightening a loose screw fixed the slop in the focus barrel, and it was buttery smooth with the proper resistance for making minute adjustments. Which is a benefit consider how narrow the DOF gets on a 135 at f2.8.
Despite an all metal construction, I was surprised by how light this lens is. Usually that is a sign of cheaply made optics, and fortunately such was not the case.
Initial testing in the studio on a tripod using flash confirmed the lens’ sharpness, and compared nicely with my 135 f2L.
Crop: Canon 135 f2L left, Soligor 135 f2.8 right.
Shooting the lens outside proved to be a pleasure in both use and result. Its multi-coated optics handles flare well, as I could not see any issue when shot towards the Sun. Colors are also accurate and vivid, requiring very little post correction. However, slight CA/purple fringing was evident, which is correctable in software.
Shot handheld on EOS 1Ds Mark I (full frame) iso100, 1/160s. Crop of same image left. Note sharpness of details.
Bokeh (background blur, or out of focus ares) is also nice, and very gaussian like or smooth, and does not draw attention to itself, making isolated objects more pleasurable to view.
On a final note. To assume that all Soligor's of similiar construction are winners has to be taken with some caution. That is, your particular copy may or may not perform as well as mine. Many third party lens makers were not known for their strict quality controls, and time and and use (or abuse) can render a seemingly identical lens as a worthless piece of junk. However, that is the beauty of vintage lenses, being cheap enough to take the risk, and the reward of finding a true gem.
-Keep Shooting.
|